Comparison of the predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Infant Neurological International Battery in low-birth-weight infants: a prospective longitudinal study

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Physiotherapy Quarterly

Abstract

Introduction. This study aims to test the predictive validity of the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) against the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 (PDMS-2) at 4, 8 and 12 months of age in low birth weight (LBW) infants. Methods. Motor development in 18 LBW infants was examined prospectively at 4, 8 and 12 months. A professional investigator assessed the motor development of these infants using the AIMS, INFANIB and PDMS-2. The validity of the results was assessed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests on the total raw scores of PDMS-2, AIMS and INFANIB at the three distinct age points. The chi-square test was used to calculate the association between INFANIB and AIMS with PDMS-2 for normal and LBW infants at each age point. Results. The INFANIB and AIMS scores were both associated with PDMS-2 at all three age points. However, INFANIB demonstrated a higher predictive validity for PDMS-2 in LBW infants than AIMS. Conclusions. The INFANIB has greater predictive validity than AIMS for assessing motor outcomes in LBW infants at 4, 8 and 12 months.

First Page

39

Last Page

44

DOI

10.5114/pq/188340

Publication Date

1-1-2025

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS